The original accusation, the underlying premise for the entire hissy fit by the chronic sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome’s about Russian collusion was that the Russians hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks.
Recently Internet entrepreneur and hacker, Kim DotCom, admitted that he was part of an operation along with Seth Rich, an employee of the DNC to get internal emails to Wikileaks.
Now we have proof that this underlying premise was a lie all along. We now know that the person who really did give the DNC emails to Wikileaks didn’t have to hack in because he was an insider to begin with: Seth Rich.
We also know that Seth Rich was mysteriously killed in Washington DC on July 8, 2016, 27 and that the Metro Police are slow-walking the investigation. The police say it was a botched robbery. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch, and phone.
In August Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich. Julian Assange also suggested in August that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant. Kim Dotcom tweeted out that he has evidence Seth Rich, the murdered DNC operative, is the Wikileaks source. He’s ready to release the evidence to Congressional investigators. It doesn’t seem as if anyone in Washington is interested since this shines a light on the lie that started it all.
There is so much about this that is interesting. Such as, the fact that the DNC leaders, Hillary Clinton, and Podesta, never disputed what was said in the emails. They instead attacked how the information was leaked. The media, of course, misdirected as best they could to cover up the facts. Look at who made the accusations, not at the accusations themselves.
If there was any fraud in the last election cycle it was the DNC fat cats stacking the deck against Bernie Sanders in the primaries.
I continue to ask if the Russians hacked the election and Hillary won the popular vote whose side were they on. Just ask yourself: who would the Russians rather have as president of the United States a corrupt politician that everyone in the world knows can be bribed or a billionaire who says, “Drill Baby Drill” when their economy is based on oil?
Now we have a Special Counsel to investigate a non-crime that probably makes sense inside the beltway and through the looking glass.
Why not have a Special Counsel to investigate Bill Clinton’s visit with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac in Arizona. How about one to investigate all the people illegally leaking confidential material in an attempt to thwart the Trump agenda? What about one to investigate how many people were illegally unmasked by Susan Rice and the rest of the Obama hit machine?
If we’re going to impanel Special Counsels to investigate rumors why stop until we’ve investigated them all?
Where are the over 30,000 emails deleted by Hillary Clinton?
If the massive donations to the Clinton Foundations weren’t thinly veiled bribes why did they dry up as soon as Hillary lost the election?
Special Counsels like Special Prosecutors take on a life of their own. Which is eventually close to the half-life of a radioactive material, it lives on and on and on. They need convictions to justify the bloated staffs and budgets that they acquire in years of so-called investigations.
Look at the case of who leaked the name of Valerie Plame. The whole thing started with an article on July 14, 2003, by Robert Novak, a journalist for The Washington Post. This article named Plame as a CIA operative effectively ending her career. Before the Special Prosecutor was even named people in the government knew that the source of the leak was Richard Armitage. However he was an insider, a member of the establishment, so he couldn’t end up as the fall guy.
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald pushed and prodded until he was able to catch someone in a discrepancy between multiple interviews over several years. Then he prosecuted Scooter Libby for that discrepancy and got a conviction. It was not for revealing Plame’s name but for impeding the investigation into something that was already known before the investigation began.
Back in 1980 when Ronald Reagan won shocking the Democrat establishment they demanded an investigation of his Presidential campaign saying they made a deal with Iran to delay the release of American hostages until after the election. How else could this has been actor beat a sitting president as successful as Jimmy Carter? That’s when Tom Foley the Democrat leader of the House said, “We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, but the seriousness of the allegations, and the weight of circumstantial information, compel an effort to establish the facts.” As long as we are going to continue to follow the Democrat’s criteria for investigations let’s go for the Holy Grail.
Let’s investigate the report that Obama’s Kenyan (paternal) grandmother, as well as his half-brother and half-sister, testified that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the president claims. And there is reported testimony from a Mombasa science teacher and the Mombasa Registrar of births that Obama’s birth certificate from Mombasa is genuine. This report shows a copy of President Obama’s birth certificate that Lucas Smith obtained through the help of a Kenyan Colonel who got it recently directly from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
So, if we’re going to have Special Counsels let’s have a bunch of them. Let’s look into every rumor and accusation in Washington. That should cause enough gridlock to hopefully protect us from all the help the perpetually re-elected continue to force upon us. Maybe then we could live our lives in peace as they all scurry into the shadows like roaches when you turn on the light.
Drain the swamp!
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion. He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2017 Contact Dr. Owens firstname.lastname@example.org Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens
Powered by WPeMatico